Ben Cohen in various states of underwear will be featured in the next day of posts, so stick around, or come back often.
Category Archives: Shirtless Male Celebrities
September
2012
August
2012
Shirtless Sunday: Tom Cruise
Because some people still find him hot. Once again, I am not some people, but I don’t begrudge anyone a bit of nostalgia.
August
2012
The Evolution of David Beckham’s Bulge
Despite our in-flux status, or perhaps because of it, this seems as good a time as any to examine the evolution of David Beckham and his briefs-encapsulated bulge. God knows we could use the hits… The featured image above is the first time many of us got a glimpse of Becks and his balls, and it remains iconic. Compare that to the one below, in which he appeared with his wife, Victoria (who will always be known as Posh in my book). As much as I love her, I’ve cropped much of her out.
A few years pass before his latest venture, his own line of underwear for H&M. As disappointing as their first offering was (fabric and fit was all wrong), I may have to give it another go, even with the unfortunate mustache that accompanies the new promo images. The Power of Beckham in Briefs. It’s very real.
August
2012
Chris Evans, Shamelessly Shirtless
Before David Beckham (who’s up tomorrow), a throwback to one of this site’s former, and likely future, favorites – Mr. Chris Evans. For a brief bit, there were rumors that his publicist no longer wanted him to do shirtless shots. I’m guessing the gay mafia took that person out, because he has since been seen sans shirt again.
Not that there is such a thing as the gay mafia. I have neither heard nor see anything. I know even less.
August
2012
Paul Ryan, Shirtless for Real
From the heroes (Ben Cohen) to the villains, this is Paul Ryan, the man who wants to end Medicare. (Not entirely sure of the absolute accuracy of that last part, but neither is the GOP.)
August
2012
A Ben Cohen Bone, Shirtless
While we’re under construction, a bit of a shirtless (and surprisingly tan) Ben Cohen to tide you over…
August
2012
August
2012
Zac Efron’s Wet Tighty Whities
February
2012
The Bulging Briefs of David Beckham
It may be blasphemy to say this, but is it really all that? Here is David Beckham in his tightey-whitey briefs – a product of his current Bodywear line for H&M. I managed to snag a few specimens last time I was at the mall (there wasn’t exactly a line or shortage for Mr. Beckham’s underwear in upstate New York), and my first impressions were not anything to blog about – at least not in any glowing-review sort of way.
The fit and design were flat, as if someone had simply taken two pieces of fabric shaped like briefs and trunks and simply sewed them together. There was no room for contours, no consideration for bulges or packages, and that’s the death-knell for a decent pair of underwear.
The trunks ride up on the thighs, which, if you don’t mind it, is not the worst thing in the world, but what’s the point of trunks if they’re just going to slide themselves into briefs? The briefs were better suited at staying put, but only because the fit was so tight.
Even the logo bothers me, with its Tom-Ford-wanna-be font, pierced through with an off-centered hole-punch to signify his football glory. It feels like a concept that fell slightly short of its goal, not quite abstract enough to arouse interest, but obscure to the point of annoyance.
If this is what I have to put up with to get into Beckham’s drawers, then I’m perfectly content with keeping them closed.
February
2012
The Shame of the Game
Last night I finally got around to seeing Steve McQueen’s devastating masterpiece ‘Shame’, and Michael Fassbender and Carey Mulligan gave two hypnotic and gut-wrenching performances. It was easily the best movie I’ve seen in a very long time, and it will haunt me for a while. Though my straight-date Skip ended up not going, I was lucky enough to be joined by my friend Vinny, so I didn’t have to go it alone. At the end, it turned out our friend Albert was in the theater as well.
That said, once it began, I sat mesmerized by the film, lulled in by its eerie quietness, and raw, often-literally, naked tone. It wasn’t always easy to watch, but you absolutely cannot stop. This is a harrowing view of modern-life, a seering, stark, unflinching glimpse at the way we live today.
Many of us, well, some of us, have been through what I affectionately term a ‘slutty’ period. It happens for different reasons – some chalk it up to youth, others to pain, some to abandonment, others to abuse – and for me it was a little of everything, coming at a time when I the first man I truly loved broke up with me.
Going into the movie, and knowing a brief synopsis of its sex-addict plot, I feared a triggering of unhappy memories. No matter how far-removed we may be from our past, it’s really just right behind us, still in our heads, still in our hearts, waiting for the right moment to re-appear and daunt us again in its power to remind and resonate.
Yet ‘Shame’ is not at all a treatise on sex. None of the romps depicted here are the least bit erotic or enjoyable. None of the nudity is arousing. If you’re only going to ogle Mr. Fassbender’s impressive appendage, you’ll be sorely tricked into feeling things not in your nether regions, but in the deep recesses of any hurt or pain that you’ve ever experienced. ‘Shame’ brings up the emptiness of our dimmest souls, the ones who have been so damaged they’ve seemingly gone beyond the point of redemption.
That the protagonists of this film seem doomed to never forget their atrocious pasts is little consolation, yet the glimmer of hope may be in that very fact. The only path through this life is a painful one. We are foolish to think there is any other way. Faith, in its dwindling, limited supply, gives us little to go on, and love is but a bond only waiting to unravel, to entrap.
The only way out is to stop feeling. The only way to survive is to calm the quivering heart, quell the firing synapses of the brain. When you can’t count on your own family, when you can’t count on love, what are we left? Or to paraphrase one hopeful character, Why are we here if we don’t mean anything to each other?
Yet even in the sad, awful, disturbing way we sexually conquer one another, in the sadistic, heartless, cruel manner in which we abuse ourselves, there is the slightest sliver of grace. It might come in the form of sadness and angst, sorrow and the absence of laughter, regret and loneliness, but it still comes.
It is a quiet grace, a stilled grace, a grace that weeps at the moment of ejaculation, a grace that cries silently into the rain. It haunts the heart and pierces the mind. It hurts like hell and then recedes into nothingness. It is the grace of being human, and being in this world. It is, I think, the saddest grace, and for that I will always be a little sorry. And thankful.
“We’re not bad people. We just come from a bad place…”
January
2012
When Beckham’s Bulge Gets Boring
There will always be some sort of cheap thrill to be gleaned when David Beckham shimmies into his skivvies for a photo shoot, and especially when he releases a line of “bodywear” under his own name. Given that he’s done just that, and we are about to be deluged with an avalanche of moody black and white photos showcasing his shirtless physique and cloth-bound package, I thought it would once again be like those heady (and ballsy) days of that first Armani underwear campaign.
For someone of his stature to front the original promos with his prominent bulge bursting forth in a tight pair of white briefs was bold and brazen. Instantly iconic, the above pic solidified his gay-pin-up status then and there. In the ensuing ads, artfully styled and lit, he continued to go where no man of his fame-level had gone before.
Now, he has released his very own line of underwear, and the first set of ads has premiered. My reaction: one big yawn. In the same way that Mario Lopez played it safe with his debut underwear line, Mr. Beckham seems to have misplaced his balls (metaphorically at least, as they’re still very much front and center in these pics).
Beckham simply opts for the ubiquitous gray backdrop, and himself front and center. This would be fine if there were something more exciting to sell. Dull color selections, and even duller styles, do not make for a splashy entrance into the design world. There is nothing very imaginative or exciting about these pieces. Given that they are being sold as bodywear, there may be more of a sense of function rather than fashion to them, but come on – the majority of buyers aren’t going to be soccer-playing DILFs – they’re going to be urban gay guys who expect a little more bang for their buck.
I’m not going to lie and pretend that I’ll never look at Mr. Beckham in his briefs again, but as far as getting excited over this latest batch of bulges, the thrill is gone.
January
2012
Brad Goreski, Without Shirt or Bow Tie
Having never seen The Rachel Zoe Project, I knew little to nothing of Brad Goreski – and even after being pummeled by the promos for tonight’s premiere of “It’s a Brad, Brad World†on Bravo, the only thing I really got was his love of bow ties and glasses. (Neither of which is in evidence in these beefcake shots by dirty birdy photog Terry Anderson.)
However, it is clear to me that the boy’s got style, and anyone who rocks a bow tie deserves to be given a chance.
December
2011
Harry Judd Gives Good Attitude
My virgin brush with the UK Publication Attitude came in 1997 when I was visiting London for the first time. Finding this magazine in the midst of my coming out process was a fortuitous bit of timing and destiny. Since then I usually check it out whenever I find it at a newstand, mostly for its eye candy and cheeky British writing.
This month’s issue features Harry Judd. I have no idea who Harry Judd is, nor does it really matter. He’s in his tighty-whities, and he fills them out quite nicely. Enough said.
November
2011
Kardashian Khaos
For the most part I’ve always refrained from saying bad things about Kim Kardashian because she never really registered on my radar. I figured if she was living her life and making her own money, why should it concern me? But even I couldn’t escape the hyped-to-high-hell extravaganza that was her wedding, and though I skipped out on the hours of coverage, I was aware of it. The only time she raised my ire was when I discovered that this was her second wedding. Even then I figured if she was happy, and her husband-to-be was happy, then why should I care?
When she filed for divorce 72 days later, however, I took a little offense. Some of us still can’t get married once in most of this country, much less twice – and for her to so flagrantly throw the vows of marriage away flies in the face of everyone who so honors that tradition. I would think anyone that valued love would find it offensive, particularly in light of all the money she and her family made off the whole thing. All of those millions of dollars just wasted… I think of all the people in this world who could have been substantially helped with that money – good people who are doing good things to help others – and I think of what Kim Kardashian did with it and it makes me sick. But again, that was her right, her money, and if someone is willing to spend it and watch her foolish antics on television or buy her stupid perfume, then more power to her. The offense comes in the way she hyped it, hawked it, and ultimately divorced it.
(As for her hapless neanderthal of a husband Kris Humphries, I only hope he got a nice cut of everything too. Seems a waste to give up your integrity, honor, and public image for anything less than a couple million.)
PS – Anyone who Tweets with exclamation points on the day of their divorce is fucked up.
October
2011
The Hunky Joe Manganiello
This is exactly what I don’t want my body to be (not that it would ever come close…) It’s just too built, too hairless, too… perfect. Perfection is a lofty goal, but an unattainable one – and I never go for the impossible. Not that there’s anything wrong with Joe Manganiello (who is the man in the above photo) – he’s just not my cup of tea. However, allowing for all tastes and preferences, I’m putting this popular gentleman up front and shirtless for all of his fans to see (though if you’ve been on the internet at all in the last month you’ve already seen it).
Personally, I’m not sure what all the fuss is about. I’ve never seen ‘True Blood’ (gasp if you must), nor do I intend to see the new male stripper movie he’s currently filming, so Mr. Manganiello doesn’t score high on my list of interests. Maybe you can tell me what I’m missing…