Category Archives: Theater

Witches Can Be Right, Giants Can Be Good

It first cast its spell over me in 1988. At Proctor’s Theater with my Mom and Suzie, the house lights went down, the fairy tale began, and we walked ‘Into the Woods.’ I was too young to fully understand the giant metaphors, but I understood the feeling of loneliness and abandonment, even at a young age. A short time later, I got the cast recording and learned it start to finish. I played the lush Stephen Sondheim score over and over again, taken with its whimsical melodies set against dark undertones and epic worldly themes. I was drawn in by the music, enthralled by the fairy tale references, and moved by something much deeper.

The prettier the flower, the farther from the path.

Years later, Suzie and I would attend the Broadway revival of the show. Viewing it as an adult was a different experience, but not vastly so. In some ways – many, a few would say – I was still that kid in the audience. Rapt with wonder, entranced by theatrical magic, and touched by the themes all over again, I found myself thinking of family, and friendship, and the ways we try to help each other through the woods.

Just remember: someone is on your side, someone else is not.

This December, ‘Into the Woods’ gets its Disney-fied movie release, at the hands of ‘Chicago’ director Rob Marshall. While I’ve heard of some sanitizing of the plot (oh Disney, people have affairs, get over it) and things will have to be streamlined (it’s a tangle of entwining storylines), I have some hope given the trailer seen here.

Sondheim’s genius was in the way he crafted such deceptively-accessible music to go along with such subterranean themes of darkness and despair. The chilling conceit is hinted at in these delicious peeks at Meryl Streep as the Witch and Johnny Depp as the Wolf. If anyone can hold onto the gritty integrity of the source material, it’s Ms. Streep.

How excited am I to see this on the big screen? Let’s just say this is the first time I’m contemplating seeing a movie on Christmas, the day of its release.

I wish…
I know.
Continue reading ...

The Fabulous Phantom

It is decidedly uncool among certain snobby circles to salivate over anything by Andrew Lloyd Webber. Over the years, I fell prey to this tendency (perhaps it was the soundtrack playing incessantly over the sound system of The Venetian in Las Vegas) but upon revisiting the reinvented touring version of ‘The Phantom of the Opera’, I’ve come around again to the music of the night. Perhaps it is the pop-opera aspirations (mostly met) of Sir Andrew’s orchestrations, or the reinvigorated energy of this new production, but as I sat in the front row of the Boston Opera House and watched the dark gorgeousness unfold again, I realized why this is the longest-running show in Broadway history.

This revamping wisely does not mess with the music, though it changes up the classic staging in ways that largely work for a touring show. What it loses on the epic scale (the endless set of steps of the original staging of ‘Masquerade’ or the expansive candlelit lake that rose out of the ground for the title track) it makes up for in intimate grandeur – an ingenious set of stairs that leads down to the Phantom’s lair and the jewel box design of interior rooms and backstage vignettes. While there are pyrotechnics and spectacular costumes, along with enough smoke to obscure the orchestra’s sheet music, it is the energy and vigor of the performers that keeps this Phantom so fresh.

The three leads are powerfully adept at helping this new production, which manages to deliver the over-the-top drama with moments of genuine wonder and tenderness. Julia Udine is the soaring soprano who brings Christine Daae to fragile yet steely life. Her voice is pristine, and she brings tremulous torment to the apex of the triangle grounded by a father-figure Phantom and childhood-love Raoul. The latter is played winningly by Ben Jacoby, with marquee handsomeness and equally-fine vocal prowess. Every production of the musical depends on the titular character, and Cooper Grodin as the Phantom lends the proper gravitas and fiery passion, tamed by a vulnerability that makes Christine’s dilemma believable. Mr. Grodin channels echoes of Lou Chaney in posture and menace, giving his portrayal a darker edge, and adding layers of complexity to a fascinatingly flawed creature.

With a solid supporting cast, this reborn Phantom is worth another look. As the chandelier rose above us, I was reminded of the first time I saw the show – the enchantment, the magic, and the promise of a journey to another world. That’s been forgotten a bit in this cynical age, and it’s easy to dismiss such histrionics as a singing masked man. Yet the heart of the angel of music still beats, and, if you allow yourself, it’s still possible to be swept away in the romance and the mystery of the Phantom.

Continue reading ...

Is It A Sin To Love Too Much? ‘Here Lies Love’ Review

We love to see our idols fall. It’s an infuriating aspect of human nature that we somehow enjoy their pain as much as their pleasure. Before we can revel in them at their lowest, however, we must first raise them up. That supersonic trajectory and its subsequent plummet, forms the powerful pumping heart of ‘Here Lies Love’, a musical that sings the story of Imelda Marcos, notorious First Lady of the Philippines.

Like its complex heroine and the country in which it’s set, ‘Here Lies Love’ is brash, brilliant, and over-the-top in all the right ways. It personifies the Philippines in ways subtle and overt, with its strange juxtaposition of Catholicism, hedonism, treachery, honor, and, yes, love. As a Filipino myself, I’ve always maintained that we’re a crazy, fun-loving culture, filled with a riotous mash of squalor, beauty, violence, peace, laughter and tears. In other words, it’s just like any other country, with the drama racked up a few notches, all backed by a cheesy dance track. Having visited the Philippines a number of years ago, I can also vouch for the fact that the Filipinos love their karaoke, and take it rather seriously. (In fact, someone was literally shot when their rendition of ‘My Way’ was not up to par. True story.) That’s the kind of atmosphere that makes ‘Here Lies Love’ such a perfect personification of the Philippines and its most famous First Lady.

“Is it a sin to love too much?” Imelda asks as a young girl. She is just a teenager, making googly eyes at a white-suited Ninoy Aquino (a twist to the story that I originally found too good to be true, but after researching it, it appears based in fact) who rejects her for being too tall for his burgeoning political career. Following that she finds her way to the charismatic Ferdinand Marcos, who is leading his own campaign to become President, and she is swept off her feet into a politically-charged world of power, glamour, and burgeoning corruption.

The music of David Byrne and Fatboy Slim, which originally spear-headed this production in the form of a concept album, is the perfect disco-infused impetus to drive a Filipino tale like this. Don’t let those disco touches dissuade you from giving props to the tunes: these are solid songs, grounded with some gorgeous melodies and performed by some spectacular voices.

Ruthie Ann Miles brings the voice and the looks to the former beauty-queen, and an uncanny resemblance to Imelda (those sky-high shoulders and that bulbous chignon certainly aid in the magic), but more compelling than all of that is the way she crafts the arc of her character’s journey from innocence and passion to calculation and cruelty, never losing an ounce of the complexity and vulnerability of a woman caught up in her own myth, trying to hang onto her husband, and herself.

As the seductive dictator, Jose Llana brings political charisma, chiseled sex appeal, and a palpable power to Ferdinand Marcos. It’s a testament to his charm and magnetism that, while knowing all the while what Marcos really did, we still can’t help but fall prey to Mr. Llana’s alluring performance. He draws us in with one of the most beautiful songs of the evening, ‘A Perfect Hand’, which makes optimal use of its audience interaction as a news crew follows Llana around the room as he campaigns and poses with his constituents, projecting the images on screens and giving several audience members their moment in the limelight. If you have any doubt as to the effectiveness of the audience participation required of the program, it dissipates here.

As intoxicating as Llana’s Marcos is, the heart of the show belongs to Conrad Ricamora as Ninoy Aquino, who becomes the real champion of the people, giving voice and vitality to the emotional depth of the proceedings. His character is not without fault, however, and such complexities are what make this more than just a disco-karaoke romp. It’s a tragic fairy tale with a dark heart, shot through with jabs of hilarity, and soaked in moments of deeply-affecting pathos. That it manages to be this entertaining is a thing of wonder.

After a rousing song lamenting the assassination of Aquino, performed by his grieving mother no less, Imelda appears high on a ladder, decked out in a sparkling gown. “Why don’t you love me?” she sings, entirely oblivious to the devastation at hand, and fixated solely on herself.  She asks in a way both comical and earnest. If she has become a monster, we the people have had as much a hand in it as her, allowing ourselves to be duped, wanting to believe in something better for someone else, wanting to believe we had a champion.

Trapped in her opulent palace, she looks up as a helicopter roars overhead, waiting to whisk her and her husband away to exile. A figure the public has built up to be, reviled and revered, she stands as a symbol of her country, a symbol of someone we think we want to be – breathtaking, beautiful, cruel, glamorous, and greedy.

That’s the beauty of this production and its people -“ it’s ridiculous but at the same time moving, as hilarious as it is heart-breaking, and it requires a cast and crew that can expertly execute moves with precision and grace. The staging is intricate, with some hokey-but-effective choreography, and the audience moves with the action. In fact, if they don’t move they’re likely to get run-over. This immersive nature of the show works, as the audience becomes part of the People Party, standing in and making it onto the screen in news reports, dancing along with Imelda as she hits the hottest clubs of the world, and ultimately joining in a final demonstration of peace.

It totters on that tricky border between high-art and cheesy-sleaze – there’s certainly a bit of the tacky at work, but it’s done with a wink and a heartwarming smile. If you give yourself over to the guilty-pleasure aspects of it you can’t help but be taken to a fantastical place half-way around the world, moved to the paradisiacal and perilous plane of the Philippines, where the beat never slackens, and the party never stops.

{Photos by Joan Marcus.}

Continue reading ...

A Glimpse of Imelda Marcos via New York City

A sooner-than-expected return to New York comes in the form of this weekend’s quick jaunt to the city, where I’ll be hanging out with Chris and Suzie, and seeing ‘Here Lies Love’ – the Imelda Marcos musical currently playing Off-Broadway at The Public Theater. That’s right, an Imelda Marcos musical. I’ve been keeping my eye on this production for a while now – and it almost made it into last year’s plans with Mom, but it was sold out. When it reopened a short time ago, I decided that I needed to see it, and who better than Suzie and Chris to join me? The old team will be back in business.

The last time I was Off-Broadway was for the original run of ‘Hedwig and the Angry Inch’, and prior to that it was to see Greg Louganis in ‘The Only Thing Worse You Could Have Told Me.’ (I’d always intended to drag Suzie to ‘Naked Boys Singing’ but so far she’s escaped that fun fate.)

As for Ms. Marcos, she has, for reasons both obvious and hidden, been an inspiration. First, there is the Filipino connection. I’ve been to the country and the city where she reigned. I’ve seen some of the things she’s seen. I come from a large family whose majority of members still live there. Second, there are those shoes – so many shoes, so little time. I know the love of fancy footwear. Third, there is that image. The albatross from which she can never escape. A combination of misunderstanding, misbehavior, and Ms. Dictator. I know that cage, I’ve felt those shackles, and I’ve battled that pesky bird. Regardless of questionable morality and any poor decisions she may have made (the Marcos regime, of which she was an integral part, admittedly did commit many atrocities), she was just a person, who came from another province of the Philippines, but became something more. Whether she deserved it or not (the good and the bad that would eventually befall her) I cannot believe that there weren’t moments of noble intent, flashes of being a charitable person. We’re all capable of a few glimmers of goodness. After all, dictators and their wives aren’t born, they’re created, often by the very people who end up vilifying them.

I think it was a photograph in Time Magazine or Newsweek, in a cover story on Ms. Marcos, that originally captured my interest. It wasn’t the long rows of shoes or the expansive closets, it wasn’t in her grand chignon or the flowers in said chignon – it was a simple photo of her bathtub: richly appointed and peaceful, elegant but not ostentatious, surrounded by lush plants, and filled with bubbles. It was the look of luxury, the look of success, the look of beauty that then and there became the main goal of my life. It presented a glimpse of the Pretty.

At the time (and I was only in sixth grade) I set about to making my bathroom into something approximating that vision. A strappy dracaena drooped in the corner of the bathtub. I wiped out a spiderweb from another corner, along with its long-dessicated maker. I piled decorative shell-shaped soaps along the sink, inhaling their flowery scent and wondering if this is what Imelda smelled when she swooped into her toilette. I folded fluffy washcloths into neat triangles, arranging them carefully along the towel holder. And when it was done, I looked around and felt supremely disappointed.

It was grandly delusional, it was fabulously frivolous, and it was voraciously vacuous. Even when filled with warm water and bubbles, my bath was empty. It echoed with loneliness and solitude. There was no one to see. It was then that I realized all the pretty shoes in the world could not stamp out the longings of the heart.

Continue reading ...

The Greatest Misfit of All: ‘Hedwig & the Angry Inch’

The hottest ticket of the season belongs to the titular victim of a botched sex operation in ‘Hedwig and the Angry Inch.’ If you’re lucky enough to get seated in the first few rows you may get a kiss, a motorboat, a car-wash, or a drop of glittery sweat. I got something far more precious. A song or two into the show, Neil Patrick Harris as Hedwig looked me straight in the eye, raised his middle finger, and mouthed the words, ‘Fuck you.’ It was glorious. It was thrilling. It was the blessing of Hedwig.

Gorgeous and grotesque, hilarious and morose, male and female, good and bad ~ Hedwig embodies the best and worst within all of us. Harris gives his blood, sweat, and tears to this committed performance. As the “internationally ignored” songstress of the show, he is making the star-turn of the Broadway year, and every accolade you’ve heard turns out to be winningly accurate. He doesn’t leave the stage once for the intermission-free marathon of a show, even as he does countless costume changes (most of Hedwig’s sartorial journey is one show-long strip-tease, with a couple of hair-raising exceptions – and for one of those quick-changes, his head still manages to remain on-stage.) Defying conventional Broadway rules, this is more of a rock-show than a book-musical, but the loose narrative is given bulk and weight by the themes of identity (sexual and otherwise,) loss, sacrifice, family, love, cruelty, redemption, and acceptance.

Hedwig represents and champions the misfits and losers, not in any heavy-handed anti-bullying message, but rather through sheer exuberance and example – of living as she is and not making any apologies for it. Hedwig has been dealt a rather cruel number of blows (ba-dum-bum) but her resilience, her perseverance, and, yes, her bitterness, turn her into a champion. There is rage burning here, mostly misdirected toward the put-upon Yitzhak, who gives challenge to Hedwig’s attention-getting theatrics with his own sheer talent and propensity for toying with wigs. It’s a risky move – showing off in the proximity to such a show-off – and it takes Hedwig the majority of the show to offer someone else the spotlight.

Harris is so mesmerizing and entertaining as Hedwig, projecting such raw star power and finesse, it almost works against the show in that it’s unbelievable how Hedwig did not become the star that her nemesis Tommy Gnosis did, until you think about her story, her appearance, and the ways we resist all that is foreign and different. That becomes the sad apex of the show, and in the final third of the evening, as she comes to terms with the unfair hand she was dealt, in a moment of redemption and forgiveness, she overcomes her outsize, over-compensated ego, and gives her “husband” Yitzhak the opportunity to do what she never could.

It is an act of supreme generosity and it frees both Hedwig and Yitzhak in one fell, and moving, swoop. As she rises on a pedestal, recalling the boy she was, and the person she longed to be, she also comes to a sort of peace with the Hedwig within. Like most of us, that defies a rigid idea of gender or a single set rule of what it means to be human. We are like the multi-faceted crystals hanging from her first outfit, throwing off different colors depending on the light and shadows of life, moving and fluid, yet sharp and dangerous.

Not many of us can directly relate to the story of a sex change operation gone so horribly wrong, nor of the brush with fame, or such singular musical talent, but somehow Hedwig manages to touch a heart-string of humanity, ring a gorgeously raw note from it, and leave us all just a little better for having heard it plucked.

Continue reading ...

Unfinished Bridges

Why is it that certain undeserving shows seem to run now and forever, while more thoughtful and beautiful works close before they can be fully appreciated? Such was the question that ran through my mind as I took in a performance of ‘The Bridges of Madison County’ the weekend before it was set to close. As written by the brilliant Jason Robert Brown (‘Parade’, ‘Songs for a New World’) the raved-about score does indeed prove ‘gorgeously rapturous,’ and the lead performances are nothing short of magnificent. This is a show that must be heard in its entirety to fully capture the emotional arc of its characters. It builds from its slightly mournful opening notes, into a sweeping, lush masterpiece, with touches of bouncing country bits and soaring operatic flourishes – a strange juxtaposition of Iowa and Italy that somehow works.

While this rendition of the popular but oft-maligned book is almost immaculately faithful to its source (at odds with its subject matter), a musical version of the tale sounded, on paper at least, less than thrilling. Yet it is precisely the power of the music that finally makes this story about more than a cheating housewife. ‘Bridges’ tells the narrative of Francesca Johnson, a married housewife, and Robert Kincaid, a photographer traveling through her town, and how they fall in love and deal with the aftermath of that.

It is a tough tale to sell, and only the most accomplished actress and singer could make Francesca into a heroine for whom the audience roots. Kelli O’Hara is more than up to the task, and her Francesca transforms from a woman whose main duty in life has been sacrifice, to a woman giving gratefully, if reluctantly, over to her desires. As she loosens her hair and unties her apron, Francesca comes alive in discovering her love for Robert, even as she acknowledges the pull of her husband and family.

The success of this production relies upon both her and the audience being torn. It’s not enough for her husband to be the proverbial bad-guy, and he isn’t. A bit bland perhaps, harried to the point of anger at times, but it’s still not enough to fully support Francesca’s choosing the sexy stranger ~ played with equally winning spirit (in equally fine voice) by Steven Pasquale. As Robert, Mr. Pasquale begins a bit in the dark, emerging from the back of the theater, lost literally and perhaps figuratively, before finding himself, and a focus, in Francesca. Even so, the story requires something more to be truly moving, something to convey a love that is more than excitement or kindness or sensitivity, and that added element – the one that solves the initially-insurmountable yet undeniable fact of adultery – comes in the unlikely form it has taken: a musical.

 

I can’t tell you I know what the answer will be – it’s impossible, but this thing, this is bigger than what we can see.

This is destiny. We are tied, we are locked, we are bound.

This will not be reversed or unwound.

Whatever fate the stars are weaving, we’re not breaking, I’m not leaving…

It’s the music that supplies the solution to the moral dilemma, and the songs Francesca shares with Robert (‘One Second and A Million Miles’) are what make ‘Bridges’ such a compelling, and devastating, production. It may not entirely eradicate the blame, but it makes it gorgeously relatable, inevitable in fact.

Francesca’s actions aren’t simply an act of betrayal, they are a protection of her heart, a curious way of protecting her husband and her family, with whom she could only stay after having glimpsed another life. The love she shared with Robert is carried closer to her heart, burning quietly as her life goes on, in an exquisitely staged montage of temporal movement. The moral dilemma over whether it was right or wrong is not wholly solved with the “love is never wrong” argument, but finds some minor resolution and come-uppance in the sad musing of “what-might-have-been.”

While the show is not perfect (moments ripe for greater emotional impact – Francesca and Robert’s first dance, for example – are initially given a comic, country angle when a more earnest delivery of the waltz that accompanied it may have made for greater impact), such trifles are minor compared to the emotional journey of the show, a journey matched and exalted by its music – the waves of which begin lapping softly and gently, growing into a pounding and gloriously overwhelming emotional climax that left even this hardened viewer, who was relatively unimpressed with the book, moved and affected.

The mark of artistic magic is in making the viewer empathize with something. ‘Bridges’ is the stuff of dreams almost-realized, of sacrifice and love, of safety and obligation. It’s a study of the difficult choices we must make, how we deal with those choices, how we come to terms with our decisions, and whether we will always wonder “what if?” This is a beautiful show, and though its challenging themes and somewhat-unhappily-ever-after ending does not send the audience out beaming or tapping toes, it leaves a deeper stamp upon their hearts.

Continue reading ...

‘Mothers & Sons’ as Seen by a Mother and Son

For our first show of the season, Mom and I saw, rather fittingly, ‘Mothers and Sons’ – Terrence McNally’s Tony-nominated play starring Tyne Daly. Mr. McNally has written some powerful plays over the years (notably ‘Love! Valour! Compassion!’ and ‘Master Class’ – which we had the fortune to see on Broadway during their original runs) and this one is no exception. If it doesn’t quite match the polish of those two standards, it may because this one is a little more raw, a little more urgent – something befitting the times recalled here. It helps that the play features a trio of fine performers, led by the amazing Ms. Daly, who gives a brittle, controlled, seething-just-beneath-the-surface performance as a monstrous woman (Katharine Gerard) still mourning the loss of her only child to AIDS. The early days of that plague are recalled with a distant but humane detachment. With each passing year, it becomes easier and easier to forget, and ‘Mothers and Sons’ may be McNally’s best efforts at seeing that that never happens.

Ms. Daly gives a subtle yet stunning turn as a lonely yet terrifying woman, filled with sly moments of black humor, hidden pockets of pathos, and one perfectly-rendered tear that, on this particular evening, happened to fall literally two seconds before the fall of the final curtain. That sort of precision is the work of a studied actress at the height of her power. Daly never lets her guarded heart show until the very end. In a few heaved sobs, she finds release, but it’s not quite clear if she’s found redemption. To Daly’s credit, you want to love some part of her, in spite of all her awfulness, and you almost do.

Anger plays a large part in this play, seen in the anger of her black fur coat, in her blood red dress, in her rigid black handbag that she carries with her about the apartment. Such fussiness is at odds with the relaxed, casual attire and attitude of her son’s former lover, Cal Porter, who picked up the pieces of his tragic past eight years after the death of his partner. As Cal, Frederick Weller has the emotionally-open roller coaster ride of the evening, veering from a hopeful earnest belief in people – showing a woman who has only hurt him the city of New York and drawing the audience into his comfortable life – before careening back into the dim days in which he lost his partner, and ending up somewhere ambivalently at peace with all that has happened.

Bobby Steggert as Will Ogden offers the idealistic and innocent view of the current generation, while their young son Bud (a precocious Grayson Taylor) offers a peek at the open-minded unaffected future. McNally offers many things to many people – the struggles of gay men and the AIDS crisis of the 80’s, as well as questions of age and gender roles, and new families being raised by two dads. In discussing Katherine’s past and the way she chooses to portray herself as being from Rye instead of Port Chester, New York, larger questions are raised and examined, particularly regarding secrets and the ways we pretend – or the ways we feel we have to pretend. It’s an ambitious work, that almost proves too much, threatening to dissolve beneath such broad historical strokes, but in the end it retains its heartfelt core, anchored by a spot-on group of actors who give these full-bodied characters conflicted, exasperated, heart-rendered life.

(After watching such a terrible mother mourn her son and the way she treated him throughout his short life, I was left feeling incredibly grateful for the woman who sat beside me in the theater, who loved me no matter what, and who did her best as my mother. We walked back through a misty night, to rest up for the next day’s surprise…)

Continue reading ...

A Glorious and Gorgeous ‘Gypsy’

How do you make a tyrant who manages to be both loathsome and lovable? That’s the hat trick at the heart of ‘Gypsy, A Musical Fable’ – perhaps one of the greatest pieces of musical theater ever written. This flawless fable of show-business that doubles as a dark treatise on family, fame, and ambition is currently playing at the Capital Repertory Theatre in downtown Albany, NY. With its triple pedigree (book by Arthur Laurents, music by Jules Styne, and lyrics by Stephen Sondheim) the musical suffers no lack of creative expertise, but it requires certain key players to make it soar. Luckily, the cast assembled at Capital Rep manages to do just that.

Mama Rose, a role written specifically for and originated by the incomparable Ethel Merman, has long been considered the MacBeth of musical theater. At turns seductive and menacing, heartbreaking and heart-stopping, the role is one of the most demanding, requiring an almost-scientific straddling of the razor-sharp line between love and hate. Rose must both seduce and slay the audience, and Mary Callanan is more than up to the task. Comical and cutting, diabolical and devious, vivacious with just the slightest whiff of vulnerability, Callanan cajoles then crushes her way through an evening that explodes with vocal pyrotechnics.

Any production of ‘Gypsy’ worth its weight in egg rolls depends not only on the showy performance of Mama Rose, but also on that of her daughter, Louise, who eventually becomes the title character. As Rose, Ms. Callanan dominates, but it’s Kelsey Crouch as Louise who exemplifies the greatest character development, revealing the heart of the show as it grows from something possibly tender, to something both icy and gorgeous. Crouch offers an initially meek but ultimately formidable foil to her mother (the stage-mother of all stage-mothers) and her second act transformation is simultaneously touching and terrifying. The plaintive and final plea she makes for her Mama before the stripping begins is gut-wrenching, but she never looks back, and the arc that the actress has masterfully crafted from her first moments on stage finds rich payoff in the final scenes.

Such a substantial evening of musical theater could not be so stunningly successful without a stellar supporting cast  – particularly Bob Walton as Herbie, Cara O’Brien as the Younger Louise, and Emily Louise Parker as June. Each, in their own way, serve to ground Rose’s outlandish ego and insatiable drive with humanity and touches of comedic gold. For the former, Walton evinces palpable affection in his efforts to stop or at least slow the maniacal train Rose seems hell-bent on leading full steam ahead, and for the latter a trio of strippers hilariously sleaze up the joint (including local audience favorite Benita Zahn) in the show-stopping ‘You Gotta Have A Gimmick’.

In the end, though, this is Rose’s show, and in the sizzling bring-the-house-down ‘Rose’s Turn’ Callanan lets loose with the true talent she rightfully says is now missing from the fading days of vaudeville acts. This final number begins as a grotesque act of desperation, turns into an almost-quaintly-sad realization, and ultimately burns out in a blaze of majestic pathos.

‘Gypsy’ offers little in the form of redemption, just the slightest glimmer of forgiveness, and possibly even less hope in the increasingly dark world where the innocence of vaudeville takes its last dying breath. But its soul, its white-hot showbiz pizzazz, sparkles enough to mask that pain, shining with such talent, musical might, and star power that it forges its own light.

 

Continue reading ...

A Pot to Piss In

Taking the piss out of traditional Broadway conceits, ‘Urinetown’ is currently making a splash at the Cohoes Music Hall. Despite its topic and title, and somewhat sinister plot line, this is, at its heart, a pretty standard musical, with a pastiche of jazz-inflected music and the occasional gospel rouser. When it opened on Broadway it won 4 Tony Awards, for its sharp satirization of topics weighty and light.

This version retains that wild spirit, adding its own exuberance with energetic performances, and a rollicking band under the masterful hand of Musical Director Shoshana Seid-Green. The show itself turns typical Broadway expectations on their heads while honoring and surpassing them – such as in the Act One Finale, which manages to be both earnest and cynical at once, and it’s here where the strength and genius of the show resides. That’s a razor-sharp line on which to teeter, and this production hinges on the performances of its stellar company. Helmed by a wonderfully smarmy but beguiling Evan Teich as Officer Lockstock, a robust Jon McHatton as Bobby Strong, and the bright and beautiful Elizabeth Doyle as Hope Cladwell, the show has a winning trio of leads. Shawn Morgan gives fine voice to Hope’s booming father, and equally-powerful vocals are supplied by Kayley Alissa Hinen as Penelope Pennywise, while Taylor Lane Ross all but steals the show as Little Sally.

Despite its pee-go-centric themes, ‘Urinetown’ offers some timely commentary on humanity and class (particularly the recent people vs. corporations cultural war,) but also on the traditional versus non-traditional notions of musical theater. It posits its criticisms of a feel-good Broadway show within an almost-feel-good Broadway show, and the result is as entertaining as it is enlightening.

‘Urinetown’ runs at the Cohoes Music Hall until March 23, 2014. Don’t piss away the opportunity to see it. (And that’s my last pee-pun for at least a day, I promise.)

Continue reading ...

Schenectady Adores Kristin Chenoweth (But Who Doesn’t?)

She first caught my eye scrambling to the top of a human pyramid in ‘Steel Pier’. She then cast a spell over us as she descended in a bubble for the opening of ‘Wicked’. But last night, Kristin Chenoweth captured my heart just by being herself, in her solo show at Proctors Theatre, where she brought her music and magic to an adoring crowd.

A Broadway baby who’s made a mastery of the star-turn on television and in movies, Ms. Chenoweth is perhaps best-known and most-beloved for originating the role of Galinda in ‘Wicked,’ yet she was treading the boards for years before that. I remember her fondly in a smaller, scene-stealing role in one of her first Broadway shows: John Kander and Fred Ebb’s under-appreciated ‘Steel Pier’ from 1997. I sat in the third row for that show, and every time Ms. Chenoweth came onstage, she drew the attention and energy of the entire theater with her exquisite, heart-stopping coloratura. That such a petite pixie could produce such a powerful sound was a stunning and unexpected thrill, and I found myself standing at the end of the performance just for her.

She referenced that show before launching into one of Kander and Ebb’s better-known ballads ‘Maybe This Time’ from ‘Cabaret’ – capturing the brittle crux of desperation and hope that makes Sally Bowles such a transfixing and tremulous character. Chenoweth knows her way around the dramatic rendering of a story-song, both in poignant form (‘Coloring Book’) and lighter fare (‘Taylor the Latte Boy.’)

Her background in musicals made this a gratifyingly-Broadway-focused evening, even though she has several pop/country albums under her belt. After ‘Steel Pier’ she went on to win a Tony in ‘You’re A Good Man, Charlie Brown’ and a couple of years later she returned to reclaim her Broadway crown in ‘Wicked’. The only issue I’ve had with all of her shows was that she wasn’t in every scene, which makes a solo performance such a supreme joy.

Chenoweth sprinkled self-deprecating interludes and anecdotes throughout the night (including a sweet shout-out to Schenectady’s own Ambition Cafe, where she’d gone earlier in the day) but it was her pure musical talent and artistry that reigned supreme, and the audience loved every pristine note, erupting in a couple of standing ovations.

A centerpiece of ‘Wicked’ tunes provided a contemplative gaze back over the last ten years. After performing ‘Popular’ for over a decade, she said she needed to do something to keep it interesting – in this instance that meant singing some of the verses in Japanese and German (she’s working on her Norwegian). From that touchstone song she moved into a touching audience participation moment in a duet with local eight-year-old Olivia, who held her own in ‘For Good’. Chenoweth said that Oz would always be a part of her, and proved it with a powerhouse version of ‘Over the Rainbow’ more than a little inspired by its originator Judy Garland.

Even with weaker material such as Andrew Lloyd Webber’s treacle (‘Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again’) she managed to make something transcendent, and while she impressively showed off her belting prowess at several points, it was the quieter moments that were more emotionally devastating. Her touching, delicate rendition of ‘Bring Him Home’ from ‘Les Miserables’ became a literal prayer, a song of faith, and an exhibit of finding the universal meaning in a lyric, turning it into something both intensely personal and utterly relatable. The high she gets off that sort of connection was exuberantly apparent.

The finale of the evening was her self-proclaimed anthem ‘I Was Here’ – a rousing and inspiring song in which she extols the importance of doing something that matters, and making your presence felt. In the hands of a lesser, less-genuine performer, the platitudes might have rung hollow, but in the care of such an impassioned and earnest master, it was nothing short of breathtaking. The crowd stood, demanding an encore, and Chenoweth delivered with an acoustic version of ‘I Will Always Love You’ done in original Dolly Parton fashion. It was the perfect ending to a perfect show.

Displaying genuine warmth, gratitude, grace, and a seemingly-effortless gift that soared beyond the rafters of Proctors and into the hearts of all in attendance, Chenoweth delivered a performance that cemented her status as one of the finest vocalists and song interpreters out there, as well as one of the most charismatic and enthralling stars to grace any stage.

Continue reading ...

A Perfect Ending to the Year

1995 was the year I was obsessed with ‘Sunset Boulevard’ – mostly the musical, but my enthusiasm spilled over to the original movie (which has worn far better than the musical over the ensuing years – and probably before too). Granted, the musical is far from perfect, but this scene is. It features the original Broadway cast – which is the one my mother and I saw together. Glenn Close gave one of her seminal performances as Norma Desmond, and it really was her magic that stole my heart – she was frightening, feral, humorous, desperate, moving, melancholic, giddy, ferocious, hilarious, hopeful, and utterly mesmerizing. While Betty Buckley may have had the vocal prowess, and Gloria Swanson may have been the real thing, it was Ms. Close who moved me the most in this role. I recognized in her the frantic last grasp at happiness, the distorted and disturbed result of years of being loved and adored by strangers but not one specific person. There’s a loneliness like no other in that.

I usually post this clip of my favorite scene from the musical for New Year’s. The one seen above is the best quality of the show I’ve found thus far, and in it we get to see the many nuances of Ms. Close’s performance. From the opening entrance down that magnificent staircase to that ridiculous but somehow poignant feathered-hairpiece, the whole thing always brings tears to my eyes. It wasn’t the dramatic histrionics that moved me so, or the over-the-top trappings and costumes – it was the simple moment of falling in love with someone who didn’t love you back. Ms. Desmond storms into the scene all fiery hope and intensity, refusing to believe in anything other than the happy ending she has planned for herself and Joe Gillis. She does her best, pulling out all the stops, seducing alternately like an army sergeant and a little girl, tugging on the heartstrings and a passion that was never there in the first place. I cannot watch that futile act without feeling sad. She wants so badly to be loved…

At the 3:19 mark they begin their dance, and in her eyes is all the hope of the world, focused in her gaze, her giddy motion, her girlish glee. We’ve all danced like that in our hearts – at least, if we’ve been lucky once or twice. To not know that kind of unrequited love is to not have lived. I watch her happiness at that moment, the way she loses herself in their dance, and my heart breaks a little. Every year.

Continue reading ...

Careful the Tale You Tell

The movie version of ‘Into the Woods’ is currently being filmed, and while I was reserving excitement until closer to its planned release of December 2014, the teaser photo of Meryl Streep as the Witch was just too good to ignore. ‘Into the Woods’ is one of the first musicals that had a significant impact on my life. At the time I saw it – somewhere around 1988 at Proctor’s – I was just a kid, but on the verge of being a teenager. The music of Stephen Sondheim and the fairy-tale mash-up was what first captured my attention, but only upon repeated listening did I realize, over the years, how much deeply it struck a chord. Like much of Sondheim’s work, this goes deeper than a few bright melodies (arguably his happiest-sounding score), becoming a complex, and sometimes troubling, psychological take on family, romance, and that ever-encroaching threat of ‘giants in the sky’.

Careful the things you say, children will listen,
Careful the things you do, children will see and learn.
Children may not obey, but children will listen,
Children will look to you for which way to turn, to learn what to be.
Careful before you say listen to me…

 

When I first saw the show, I was too young to realize how much loss was in it. Fortunately innocent of much of that, I didn’t see how terrible the loss of innocence, the loss of love, and the loss of parental protection could be – not just to children but to adults. As the years past, I grew to know such loss. The musical was turning darker, richer, and more frightening. When we came out of the show that first time, I remember excitedly asking my Mom if she liked it as much as I did. She seemed slightly reticent, hesitant to say much. I understand that reticence now. Was it guilt then, or simple resigned exhaustion at how fucked-up things might be?

Who can say what’s true?

Childhood can be such a muck of a fairy tale, and even when you get older it only gets muckier. Families don’t always grow up. Relationships don’t always get better. Children don’t always learn from their mistakes. Parents don’t either. And the truth can be… a terrible thing.

 

Careful the spell you cast, not just on children
Sometimes the spell may last
Past what you can see and turn against you
Careful the tale you tell, that is the spell…
Children will listen.
Continue reading ...

Les Not-So-Miserables

Being heralded as the world’s most popular musical comes with a certain cost. ‘Les Miserables’ – like ‘Phantom of the Opera’ and ‘Cats’ – has proven its worth worldwide since it first opened almost three decades ago, and also became a film that got a number of Oscar nods last year. As one of the British blockbusters of the 80’s, it was saddled with the reputation of the others as featuring spectacle and production cost over lasting substance. In the ensuing years, the musical proved the ‘lasting’ part, but the hum-drum lyrics and sometimes convoluted story-line never quite pushed it into the critically-lauded category. Those shortcomings, however, haven’t been able to touch the moving melodies of the music – and I’ve always contended that this is the real secret to the enduring appeal of the musical. That music remains intact here, taking pride of place in the production currently staging its glorious coup at the Cohoes Music Hall.

By this point in its decade-plus tenure, the Cohoes Music Hall has nothing left to prove. They have done old-fashioned traditional musicals to perfection (‘Hello Dolly!‘, ‘The Pirates of Penzance‘ and ‘Cabaret‘ ) and brought renewed vigor to the newer (now older) hits like ‘Cats‘ and ‘Sunset Boulevard‘. ‘Les Miserables’, with its voluminous cast and thundering ensemble numbers might have proved a formidable challenge, but under the direction of Jim Charles, cast and crew rise to the occasion.

Without a fifty-piece orchestra, or even amplification for that matter, the players here produce such powerful effect that it seems sometimes as if they are multiplying – so rich and full are the voices, so expansive the instrumentation. The musical direction of Charlotte Evans, and the addition of a few extra members in the orchestra pit, make such epic grandeur possible. Ms. Evans is the unsung star of this show, deftly keeping a steady pace of non-stop music, eliciting bombast when necessary and quieter jewels that still sparkle.

As for the cast, Austin Riley Green is an adequate Jean Valjean, but it’s his adversary Javert, as played by Jim Charles (doing double duty as leading player and director), who provided the stoic, yet emotional, heft of the show. This was my first time seeing Mr. Charles in a lead role at the theater (how is that even possible?) and he was a highlight of this production. As the noble-but-villain-by-default Javert, he’s saddled with the difficult role of being the unyielding, yet ultimately self-defeating, bearer of strict justice. Not once does he sway from his course, even in the face of convincing moral ambiguity, and the usually gregarious Mr. Charles never breaks stride in this convincingly powerful turn.

As I said, the power of this show lies within its music. All of its greatest and most well-known songs are represented well here, including ‘I Dreamed A Dream’ and ‘On My Own’, but it’s the ensemble pieces that rouse the most – from the inspiring ‘Do You Hear the People Sing’ to the ‘One Day More’ Act I closing montage that ties all the characters and their musical motifs together into one amazing production number.

A musical about the bloody French Revolution will always sound odd on paper, but when set to music like this – and put on with the professional panache of the players here – it works like magic.

‘Les Miserables’ runs at the Cohoes Music Hall through October 13, 2013. 

Continue reading ...

Pitching the Perfect Tent – Review of ‘Pippin’

Is there anything more terrifying than the possibility of future regret? The battle of an artist to be extraordinary while maintaining some semblance of a functioning family life has always proven fertile ground for all art forms, and nowhere is that more apparent than in the current revival of ‘Pippin’.

The ambitious coming-of-age journey of a young prince goes deeper than its superficial circus-like atmosphere would have you believe, and therein lies its genius. Director Diane Paulus brings new life and magic to the Stephen Schwartz musical, touching on issues as deep as sibling rivalry, parental control, patricide, and hints of Oedipal conflict while dazzling with circus stunts. Choreographer Chet Walker retains Bob Fosse’s signature style, jazz hands and pelvic grinds intact, to aid in the seduction, and that sort of wink is necessary to draw the audience in, and give this revival the subtext that lends it greater depth. Yet it is the amazing aerials, stunning acrobatics, and visual pyrotechnics that make the story soar.

Each of the cast gets a shot in the spotlight, which affords some amazing moments. The only problem is that the evening sometimes runs the risk of feeling like a variety show, never less than entertaining, but occasionally not much more. Luckily, the performances and the actors investing in them ground it all, and keep the story together. It is, in fact, the strength of this company – where each member is an individual, unique and distinguishable at all times – that is the real winning hand of the evening. Broadway vets like Terrence Mann and Andrea Martin (the former voraciously eating up his scenes and the latter flying high above the stage with no wires or safety net) stand out while gleefully enjoining the ensemble.

Patina Miller, as the magnificent ringleader, is at turns enticing and erotic, menacing and ferocious, seductive and sensual, biting and brutal. She is the master of ceremonies, perfectly embodying the multi-faceted tension of finding oneself, while leading Pippin, and the audience, along the road of temptation. She deservedly won the Tony for her work here, culminating in a devastating last act of defiant desperation.

As Pippin, Matthew James Thomas brings a wide-eyed naiveté to his early scenes, gently adding shades of knowledge and wisdom as he progresses on his journey, flummoxed and confounded at one point, dazed but valiantly rebounding the next. He ultimately resigns himself to a real life, rejecting all the magic, and perhaps a bit of the search for being something exceptional. The story ends not there, but with the next generation, searching and seeking out the same giddy thrills, the same heights of fantasy, the same quest for something extraordinary.

The neat thing is that after witnessing such fantastic (and literal) flights of fancy, the thrilling visuals, and an evening of entertaining enchantment, the moment when the ringleader strikes the set and withdraws the magic is a compelling challenge to both Pippin and the audience. One wants to believe that the unamplified voices and costume-free starkness can match and hold up to all the colorful theatricality that came before, but the question lingers, and haunts, and it is here where the power of this revival is finally revealed. Is it worth the trade off? Or should we never give up, never settle? It is left in vague ambivalence, tottering on a high wire of hope, as astounding and challenging as the entire evening of theater has been.

Continue reading ...

The Necessary Evil of Times Square

While I loathe Times Square (always have and always will), it is a necessary evil if you want to see a Broadway show. Back when I was younger, I was more amenable to the bright lights and meandering crowds, but today I avoid the space if at all possible. Since both of the shows we were seeing – ‘Kinky Boots‘ and ‘Pippin’ – were playing in theaters on W. 45th Street, there was no escaping the crazy scene. You can either fight the crowds and get upset and angry, or embrace it and go with the flow, following the swarms and masses that swirl and make their hapless way through the jam-packed streets. I did a little of both.

We fought it by trying to escape into lofty hotel lobbies, but embraced it by having an in-between-shows dinner at Sardi’s (early and old-school enough to be rather quiet). More about the shows that book-ended the day in other places (‘Kinky Boots’ here, and ‘Pippin’ to come), but let me just say that they were incredible. There’s something uniquely thrilling about seeing a hit Broadway show with its original cast, at the height of its post-Tony glory. And it’s worth every moment we had to spend in Times Square.

Continue reading ...